Changes in forest habitat classes under alternative climate and land-use change scenarios in the northeast and midwest, USA
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
Wildlife Habitat, Bioenergy, Biomass Harvest, Climate Change, Young Forest, Early Successional Habitat, FIA, Forest ProjectionsΠερίληψη
Large-scale and long-term habitat management plans are needed to maintain the diversity of habitat classes required by wildlife species. Planning efforts would benefit from assessments of potential climate and land-use change effects on habitats. We assessed climate and land-use driven changes in areas of closed- and open-canopy forest across the Northeast and Midwest by 2060. Our assessments were made using projections based on A1B and A2 future scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Presently, forest land covers 70.2 million ha and is evenly divided between closed- and open-canopy habitats. Projections indicated that total forest land would decrease by 3.8 or 4.5 million ha for A2 and A1B, respectively. Within persisting forest land, the balance between closed- and open-canopy habitats depended on assumed harvest rates of woody biomass. Standard harvest rates led to closed-canopy habitat attaining a slight majority of total forest land area. Intensive harvest rates resulted in the majority of forest land being in open-canopy habitat for A1B or maintained the even split between closed- and open-canopy habitats for A2. Ultimately, managers need to identify benchmark habitat conditions informed by historical conditions and wildlife population dynamics and plan to meet these benchmarks in dynamic forest landscapes.
Αναφορές
Aguilar, F.X., M. Goerndt, N. Song, and S. Shifley. 2012. Internal, External and Location Factors Influencing Cofiring of Biomass with Coal in the U.S. Northern Region. Energ. Econ. 34:1790-1798.
Annand, E.M., and F.R. Thompson, III. 1997. Forest bird response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests. J. Wildlife Manage. 61:159-171.
Askins, R.A. 2001. Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats. Wildlife Soc. B. 29:407-412.
Beaudry, F., A.M. Pidgeon, V.C. Radeloff, R.W. Howe, D.J. Mladenoff, and G.A. Bartelt. 2010. Modeling regional-scale habitat of forest birds when lands management guidelines are needed but information is limited. Biol. Conserv. 143:1759-1769.
Beaumont, L.J., L. Hughes, and A.J. Pitman. 2008. Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modeling important? Ecol. Lett. 11:1135-1146.
Bechtold, W.A. 2003. Crown-diameter prediction models for 87 species of stand-grown trees in the Eastern United States. South. J. Appl. For. 27:269-278.
Bechtold, W.A., and C.T. Scott. 2005. The Forest Inventory and Analysis plot design. P. 27-42 in The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program - National Sampling Design and Estimate Procedures. W.A. Bechtold and P.L. Patterson (Eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-80.
Betts, M.G., J.C. Hagar, J.W. Rivers, J.D. Alexander, K. McGarigal, and B.C. McComb. 2010. Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early-seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales. Ecol. Appl. 20:2116-2130.
Bierwagen, B.G., D.M. Theobald, C.R. Pyke, A. Choate, P. Groth, J.V. Thomas, and P. Morefield. 2010. National housing and impervious surface scenarios for integrated climate impact assessments. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:20887-20892.
Booth, T.H. 1990. Mapping regions climatically suitable for particular tree species at the global scale. Forest Ecol. Manag. 36:47-60.
Bragg, D.C. 2001. A local basal area adjustment for crown width prediction. North. J. Appl. For. 18:22-28.
Cook, J., and J. Beyea. 2000. Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities. Biomass Bioenerg. 18:441-455.
Coulson, D.P., and L.A. Joyce, 2010. Historical Climate Data (1940-2006) for the Conterminous United States at the County Spatial Scale Based on PRISM Climatology. Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/rds/archive/Product/RDS-2010-0010; last accessed Feb. 25, 2012.
Coulson, D.P., L.A. Joyce, D.T. Price, D.W. McKenney, R.M. Siltanen, P. Papadopol, and K. Lawrence. 2010. Climate Scenarios for the Conterminous United States at the County Spatial Scale Using SRES Scenarios A1B and A2 and PRISM Climatology. Available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/rds/archive/Product/RDS-2010-0008; last accessed Feb. 25, 2012.
Dietzman, D., K. LaJeunesse, and S. Wormstead. 2011. Northern Forest Futures Project: scoping of issues in the forest of the Northeast and Midwest of the United States. Version 3.0, June 2011. USDA For. Serv. 42 p. Available online at http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/futures/local-resources/downloads/NFFPScopingDoc.pdf; last accessed Aug. 15, 2013.
Donovan, T.M., F.R. Thompson, III, J. Faaborg, and J.R. Probst. 1995. Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks. Conserv. Biol. 9:1380-1395.
Federal Geographic Data Committee. 2008. National Vegetation Classification Standard. Vegetation Subcommittee, Federal Geographic Data Committee, FGDC Secretariat. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. 55 p.
Hagan, J.M., P.S. McKinley, A.L. Meehan, and S.L. Grove. 1997. Diversity and abundance of landbirds in a northeastern industrial forest. J. Wildlife Manage. 61:718-735.
Hamel, P.B., K.V. Rosenberg, and D.A. Buehler. 2005. Is management for golden-winged warblers and cerulean warblers compatible? P. 322-331 in Bird conservation implementation and integration in the Americas: proceedings of the third international Partners in Flight conference; 2002 March 20-24, Asilomar, CA, Volume 1, C.J. Ralph and T.D. Rich (Eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191.
Hannah, L. 2008. Protected areas and climate change. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1134:201-212.
Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press. 328 p.
Hartley, M.J. 2002. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 155:81-95.
Ince, P.J., A.D. Kramp, K.E. Skog, H.N. Spelter, and D.N. Wear. 2011. U.S. Forest Products Module: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Research Paper FPL-RP-662. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 61 p.
Iverson, L.R., and A.M. Prasad. 1998. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 68:465-485.
Janowiak, M.K., and C.R. Webster. 2010. Promoting ecological sustainability in woody biomass harvesting. J. Forest. 108:16-23.
Litvaitis, J.A. 2003. Are pre-Columbian conditions relevant baselines for managed forests in the northeastern United States? Forest Ecol Manag. 185:113-126.
Lorimer, C.G. 2001. Historical and ecological roles of disturbance in eastern North American forests: 9,000 years of change. Wildlife Soc. B. 29:425-439.
Lorimer, C.G., and A.S. White. 2003. Scale and frequency of natural disturbances in the northeastern US: implications for early successional habitats and regional age distributions. Forest Ecol Manag. 185:41-64.
Margules, C.R., and R.L. Pressey. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405:243-253.
Matthews, S., R. O'Connor, L.R. Iverson, and A.M. Prasad. 2004. Atlas of climate change effects in 150 bird species of the eastern United States. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-GTR-318. 340 p.
Miles, P.D. 2013. Forest Inventory EVALIDator web-application version 1.5.1.05. Available online at http://apps.fs.fed.us/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp; last accessed Jun. 20, 2013.
Miles, P.D., R.J. Huggett, and W.K. Moser. 2013. Northern Forest Futures database and reporting tools. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. In press.
Moore, S.E., and H.L. Allen. 1999. Plantation forestry. P. 400-433 in Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems, M.L. Hunter (ed.). Cambridge University Press, city, ST.
Moser, W.K., and S.R. Shifley. 2012. The Northern Forest Futures Project: A forward look at forest conditions in the northern United States. P. 44-54 in Environmental Futures Research: Experiences, Approaches, and Opportunities. D.N. Bengston (Ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-GTR-P-107.
NatureServe. 2011. L48 vert hab data 022011.accdb - a relational Access database. Lists of Vertebrate Species in the Contiguous U.S.; February 17, 2011.
Nelson, M.D., B.G. Tavernia, C. Toney, and B. Walters. 2012. Relating FIA data to habitat classifications via tree-based models of canopy cover. P. 254-259 in Moving from Status to Trends: Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium 2012. Morin, R.S., and G.C. Liknes (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-GTR-P-105.
Nelson, M.D., M. Brewer, C.W. Woodall, C.H. Perry, G.M. Domke, R.J. Piva, C.M. Kurtz, et al. 2011. Iowa's Forest 2008. USDA For. Serv. Resour. Bull. NRS-RB-52. 48 p.
Newton, I. 2003. Speciation and biogeography of birds. Academic Press. 656 p.
Noon, B.R., K.S. McKelvey, and B.G. Dickson. 2009. Multispecies conservation planning on U.S. federal lands. P. 51-83 in Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. J.J. Millspaugh and F.R. Thompson, III (Eds.). Academic Press, city, ST.
Opdam, P., and D. Wascher. 2004. Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 117:285-297.
Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 37:637-669.
Patton, D.R. 2011. Forest wildlife ecology and habitat management. CRC Press, city, ST. 272 p.
Pearson, R.G., T.P. Dawson, and C. Liu. 2004. Modelling species distribution in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography. 27:285-298.
Prentice, I.C., W. Cramer, S.P. Harrison, R. Leemans, R.A. Monserud, and A.M. Solomon. 1992. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J. Biogeogr. 19:117-134.
Randall, D.A., R.A. Wood, S. Bony, R. Colman, T. Fichefet, J. Fyfe, V. Kattsov, et al. 2007. Climate Models and Their Evaluation. P. 589-662 in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University Press, city, ST.
Raupach, M., G. Marland, P. Ciasis, C. Qur, J. Canadell, G. Klepper, and C.B. Field. 2007. Global and Regional Drivers of Accelerating CO2 Emissions. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:10288-10293.
Reams, G.A., W.D. Smith, M.H. Hansen, W.A. Bechtold, F.A. Roesch, and G.G. Moisen. 2005. The Forest Inventory and Analysis sampling frame. P. 11-26 in The Enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program - National Sampling Design and Estimate Procedures. W.A. Bechtold and P.L. Patterson (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-80.
Reichler, T., and J. Kim. 2008. How well do coupled models simulate today's climate? B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 89:303-311.
Riffell, S., J. Verschuyl, D. Miller, and T.B. Wigley. 2011. Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity - a meta-analysis. Forest Ecol. Manag. 261:878-887.
Robinson, S.K., and D.S. Wilcove. 1994. Forest fragmentation in the temperate zone and its effects on migratory songbirds. Bird Conserv Int. 4:233-249.
Schmidt, T.L., J.S. Spencer, Jr. and M.H. Hansen. 1996. Old and potential old forest in the Lake States, USA. Forest Ecol. Manag. 86:81-96.
Schulte, L.A., R.J. Mitchell, M.L. Hunter, Jr., J.F. Franklin, R.K. McIntyre, and B.J. Palik. 2006. Evaluating the conceptual tools for forest biodiversity conservation and their implementation in the U.S. Forest Ecol. Manag. 232:1-11.
Schwartz, M.W., L.R. Iverson, A.M. Prasad, S.N. Matthews, and R.J. O'Connor. 2006. Predicting extinctions as a result of climate change. Ecology. 87:1611-1615.
Shepard, J.P. 2006. Water quality protection in bioenergy production: The US system of forestry Best Management Practices. Biomass Bioenerg. 30:378-384.
Shifley, S.R., F.X. Aguilar, N. Song, S.I. Stewart, D.J. Nowak, D.D. Gormanson, W.K. Moser, et al. 2012. Forests of the northern United States. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-GTR-90. 202 p.
Skog, K.E, and J.A. Stanturf. 2011. Forest biomass sustainability and availability. P. 3-25 in Sustainable Production of Fuels, Chemicals, and Fibers from Forest Biomass, Zhu, J., X. Zhang, and X. Pan (eds.). American Chemical Society Symposium Series Volume 1067, city, ST.
Streby, H.M., S.M. Peterson, T.L. McAllister, and D.E. Andersen. 2011. Use of early-successional managed northern forest by mature-forest species during the post-fledging period. Condor. 113:817-824.
Tavernia, B.G., M.D. Nelson, P. Caldwell, and G. Sun. 2013. Water stress projections for the northeastern and Midwestern United States in 2060: anthropogenic and ecological consequences. J. Am. Water Resour. As. DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12075
Thomas, C.D., A. Cameron, R.E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L.J. Beaumont, Y.C. Collingham, B.F.N. Erasmus, et al. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature. 427:145-148.
Thompson, F.R., III, and R.M. DeGraaf. 2001. Conservation approaches for woody, early successional communities in the eastern United States. Wildlife Soc. B. 29:483-494.
Toney, C., J.D. Shaw, and M.D. Nelson. 2009. A stem-map model for predicting tree canopy cover of Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plots. P. 1-19 in 2008 Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium, McWilliams, W., G. Moisen, and R. Czaplewski (eds.). USDA For. Serv. Proc. RMRS-P-56CD.
Trani, M.K., R.T. Brooks, T.L. Schmidt, V.A. Rudis, and C.M. Gabbard. 2001. Patterns and trends of early successional forests in the eastern United States. Wildlife Soc. B. 29:413-424.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2012. Annual Projections. Available online at http://www.eia.gov/analysis/projection-data.cfm#annualproj; last accessed Oct. 8, 2012.
USDA Forest Service. 2012a. Future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-272. 34 p.
USDA Forest Service. 2012b. Resources Planning Act (RPA) Assessment Online. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/research/rpa/; last accessed Jul. 27, 2012.
Verboom, J., A. Schotman, P. Opdam, and J.A.J. Metz. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos. 61:149-156.
Vitz, A.C., and A.D. Rodewald. 2006. Can regenerating clearcuts benefit mature-forest songbirds? An examination of post-breeding ecology. Biol. Conserv. 127:477-486.
Wear, D.N. 2011. Forecasts of county-level land uses under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-141. 41 p.
Wear, D.N., R. Huggett, R. Li, B. Perryman, and S. Liu. 2013. Forecasts of forest conditions in regions of the United States under future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-170. 101 p.
White, E.M. 2010. Woody biomass for bioenergy and biofuels in the United States - a briefing paper. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-825. 45 p.
Woudenberg, S.W., B.L. Conkling, B.M. O'Connell, E.B. LaPoint, J.A. Turner, and K.L. Waddell. 2010. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database description and users manual version 4.0 for Phase 2. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-245. 336 p.
Zarnoch, S.J., H.K. Cordell, C.J. Betz, and L. Langner. 2010. Projecting county-level populations under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-128. 16 p.
Λήψεις
Δημοσιευμένα
Τεύχος
Ενότητα
Άδεια
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).