An assessment of invasive plants on Shorter University’s campus
Palabras clave:
Simpson’s Diversity Index, management, diversity, forest edgeResumen
Invasive plant species have various negative impacts on the ecosystems they invade. Studies have shown that invasive species decrease species diversity, cause economic loss, and reduce forest health and productivity. A study was designed to determine the presence of invasive plant species on Shorter University’s campus in Rome, GA, using 50 (1 m x 1 m) randomly allocated plots. From the initial assessment, it was determined that invasive plants are most prevalent along the forest edge, extending into the forest. Therefore, a forest edge study, consisting of 25 (1 m x 1 m) plots, was developed to assess the effects of invasive plants within the forest edge. Plants were identified to the species level and percent cover was estimated for the plots. Simpson’s Diversity Index was calculated to assess plant diversity in the forest edge. The study indicated that as the percent cover of invasive plants increased, so did the diversity of the plot. While native plant species diversity did decline, overall diversity increased because of the high density of invasive plants in the forest edge. The invasive plant species identified in this study included, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), English ivy (Hedera helix), wisteria (Wisteria sinensis), Asiatic Jasmine (Trachelospermum asiaticum), nandina (Nandina domestica), mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneate), and kudzu (Pueraria montana). These invasive species will continue to degrade the ecosystem through their rapid spread, necessitating the need to develop strategies for effective management on Shorter University’s campus.Referencias
Devine, K., and S. Fei. 2011. A review of impacts by invasive exotic plants on forest ecosystem services. General Technical Report NRS-P-78. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
Dickens, R. 1974. Cogongrass in Alabama after sixty years. Weed Science 22(2): 177-179.
Georgia Forestry Commission. 2015. Top twelve non-native invasive plants 2015 dirty dozen
list. Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon, GA. Available at: http://www.gfc.state.ga.us/forest-management/forest-health/TopTwelveNonNativeInvasivePlantsGA.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2018.
Hanula, J.L., S. Horn, and J. W. Taylor. 2009. Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) removal and
its effect on native plant communities of riparian forests. Invasive Plant Science and
Management. 2: 292-300.
Hejda, M., P. Pyšek, and V. Jarošík. 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness,
diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology. 97: 393-403.
McDonald, R. I., and D. L. Urban. 2006. Edge effects on species composition and exotic
species abundance in the North Carolina Piedmont. Biological
Invasions. 8: 1049-1060.
Miller, J.H., E. B. Chambliss, and N. J. Loewenstein. 2010. Field guide for the identification of invasive plants in southern forests. General Technical Report SRS–119. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
Miller, T.E., J.M. Kneitel, and J.H. Burns. 2002. Effect of community structure on invasion
success and rate. Ecology. 83: 898-905.
Morris, E.K., T. Causo, F. Buscot, M. Fischer, C. Hancock, T.S. Maier, T. Meiners, C. Müller, E. Obermaier, D. Prati, S.A. Socher, I. Sonnemann, N. Wäschke, T. Wubet, S. Wurst, and M.C. Rillig. 2014. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from German biodiversity exploratories. Ecology and Evolution 4(18): 3514-3524.
Olson, L. 2006. The economics of terrestrial invasive species: a review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 35: 178-194.
Oswalt, C.M., S.N. Oswalt, and W.K. Clatterbuck. 2007. Effects of Microstegium Vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus on native woody species density and diversity in a productive mixed-hardwood forest in Tennessee. Forest Ecology and Management 242: 727-732.
Pauchard, A., and K. Shea. 2006. Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across
spatial scales. Biological Invasions. 8: 399-413.
Pimentel, D., R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic
costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics. 52: 273-
Theoharides, K. A., and J. S. Dukes. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors
affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytologist. 176:
-273.
Urbatsch, L. 2002. Plant Guide: Chinese privet, Ligustrum sinense Lour. Baton Rouge, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natura Resources Conservation Service. Available at:
https://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_lisi.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2018.
Yates, E.D., J.F. Levia, and C.L. Williams. 2004. Recruitment of three non-native invasive
plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. Forest Ecology and Management. 190: 119-
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
