Automated Estimation of Forest Stand Age Using Vegetation Change Tracker and Machine Learning

Authors

  • Jobriath Scott Kauffman Center for Natural Resources Assessment and Decision Support Virginia Tech
  • Stephen P Prisley Center for Natural Resources Assessment and Decision Support Virginia Tech

Keywords:

forest disturbance, harvest type, forest age, harvest delineation, automated, machine learning

Abstract

The ability to automatically delineate forest stands and determine their age is useful for natural resources professionals. Two common approaches to estimating forest area and age-class distributions are inventory-based methods, such as Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA), and remote sensing based methods. Vegetation Change Tracker (VCT) is an algorithm that uses time series stacks of Landsat images to identify forest disturbances. However, additional computation is required to identify type of disturbance. This paper evaluates the usefulness of machine learning tools, such as support vector machine (SVM), for reclassifying VCT disturbances as stand-clearing disturbances or partial disturbances. Overall accuracy for a 2010 VCT disturbance map of the entire state of Virginia was determined to be 87 percent. 100 percent of 2010 Virginia clearcut harvests recorded in a reference dataset were classified as disturbances by VCT. Neighboring disturbed pixels, as classified by VCT, were clumped together and reclassified as stand-clearing disturbances or partial disturbances using SVM and variables for average disturbance magnitude and shape and size metrics of the clumped pixels, with an overall accuracy rate of 86 percent. The users and producers accuracy rates for stand-clearing disturbances were 88 percent and 95 percent respectively. In addition, an algorithm was developed in R for determining years since last stand-clearing disturbance for each pixel in a time series stack of reclassified VCT disturbance maps from 1984 to 2011. Neighboring pixels of the same age, in number of years since last stand-clearing disturbance, were clumped together and correspond, in general, to clearcut harvest boundaries.

Author Biographies

  • Jobriath Scott Kauffman, Center for Natural Resources Assessment and Decision Support Virginia Tech

    Forest Inventory Analyst

    Center for Natural Resources Assessment and Decision Support

    Graduate Student

    Geospatial and Environmental Analysis

    Virginia Tech

  • Stephen P Prisley, Center for Natural Resources Assessment and Decision Support Virginia Tech

    Professor, Forest Inventory and GIS B.S., Virginia Tech (1980); M.S., Virginia Tech (1982); Ph.D., Virginia Tech (1989)

    Interest Areas: Quantitative and spatial analyses of natural resources for management planning, including modeling of forest carbon inventories, inventory projection for wood supply planning, and evaluation of uncertainty in spatial decision-support systems.

References

Bechtold, W.A., and P.L. Patterson. 2005. The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program - national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-80. 88 p. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/20371.

Geosystems, L. 2004. ERDAS imagine. Atlanta, Georgia.

Hijmans, R.J. 2015. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.4-18. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.

Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N.D., Wickham, J.D., and Megown, K. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 81(5):345-354. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php.

Huang, C., L.S. Davis, and J.R.G. Townshend. 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classication. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23(4):725-749. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://sta.glcf.umd.edu/shatalin/WEBSITE3/library/publication.shtml.

Huang, C., S.N. Goward, J.G. Masek, N. Thomas, Z. Zhu, and J.E. Vogelman. 2010. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sensing of Environment. 114:183-198. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425709002685.

Meyer, D., E. Dimitriadou, K. Hornik, A. W, eingessel, and F. Leisch. 2015. Misc functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (formerly: E1071), TU Wien. R package version 1.6-7. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071.

Miles, P.D. 2016. Forest Inventory EVALIDator web-application Version 1.6.0.03. USDA For. Serv., Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN. Last accessed online on Jan. 26, 2016, at: http://apps.fs.fed.us/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp.

Pal, M., and P. Mather. 2005. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 26:1007-1011. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431160512331314083.

R Core Team. 2015. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: https://www.R-project.org/.

Therneau, T., B. Atkinson, and B. Ripley. 2015. rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1-10. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart.

VanDerWal, J., L. Falconi, S. Januchowski, L. Shoo and C. Storlie. 2014. SDMTools: Species Distribution Modelling Tools: Tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R package version 1.1-221. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-

project.org/package=SDMTools.

Venables, W.N., and B.D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York.

Zhao, F., C.Q. Huang, and Z.L. Zhu. 2015. Use of Vegetation Change Tracker and Support Vector Machine to Map Disturbance Types in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystems in a 1984-2010 Landsat Time Series. Ieee

Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. 12(8):1650-1654. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.usgs.gov.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-30

Issue

Section

Special Section on the Southern Forestry GIS Conference

How to Cite

Automated Estimation of Forest Stand Age Using Vegetation Change Tracker and Machine Learning. (2016). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 8(1), 4-13(10). https://tmp.mcfns.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/MCFNS.8.4

Similar Articles

1-10 of 94

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.