Automated Estimation of Forest Stand Age Using Vegetation Change Tracker and Machine Learning
Keywords:
forest disturbance, harvest type, forest age, harvest delineation, automated, machine learningAbstract
The ability to automatically delineate forest stands and determine their age is useful for natural resources professionals. Two common approaches to estimating forest area and age-class distributions are inventory-based methods, such as Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA), and remote sensing based methods. Vegetation Change Tracker (VCT) is an algorithm that uses time series stacks of Landsat images to identify forest disturbances. However, additional computation is required to identify type of disturbance. This paper evaluates the usefulness of machine learning tools, such as support vector machine (SVM), for reclassifying VCT disturbances as stand-clearing disturbances or partial disturbances. Overall accuracy for a 2010 VCT disturbance map of the entire state of Virginia was determined to be 87 percent. 100 percent of 2010 Virginia clearcut harvests recorded in a reference dataset were classified as disturbances by VCT. Neighboring disturbed pixels, as classified by VCT, were clumped together and reclassified as stand-clearing disturbances or partial disturbances using SVM and variables for average disturbance magnitude and shape and size metrics of the clumped pixels, with an overall accuracy rate of 86 percent. The users and producers accuracy rates for stand-clearing disturbances were 88 percent and 95 percent respectively. In addition, an algorithm was developed in R for determining years since last stand-clearing disturbance for each pixel in a time series stack of reclassified VCT disturbance maps from 1984 to 2011. Neighboring pixels of the same age, in number of years since last stand-clearing disturbance, were clumped together and correspond, in general, to clearcut harvest boundaries.
References
Bechtold, W.A., and P.L. Patterson. 2005. The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis Program - national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-80. 88 p. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/20371.
Geosystems, L. 2004. ERDAS imagine. Atlanta, Georgia.
Hijmans, R.J. 2015. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.4-18. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
Homer, C.G., Dewitz, J.A., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N.D., Wickham, J.D., and Megown, K. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 81(5):345-354. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php.
Huang, C., L.S. Davis, and J.R.G. Townshend. 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classication. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23(4):725-749. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://sta.glcf.umd.edu/shatalin/WEBSITE3/library/publication.shtml.
Huang, C., S.N. Goward, J.G. Masek, N. Thomas, Z. Zhu, and J.E. Vogelman. 2010. An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sensing of Environment. 114:183-198. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425709002685.
Meyer, D., E. Dimitriadou, K. Hornik, A. W, eingessel, and F. Leisch. 2015. Misc functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (formerly: E1071), TU Wien. R package version 1.6-7. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071.
Miles, P.D. 2016. Forest Inventory EVALIDator web-application Version 1.6.0.03. USDA For. Serv., Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN. Last accessed online on Jan. 26, 2016, at: http://apps.fs.fed.us/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp.
Pal, M., and P. Mather. 2005. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 26:1007-1011. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431160512331314083.
R Core Team. 2015. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: https://www.R-project.org/.
Therneau, T., B. Atkinson, and B. Ripley. 2015. rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1-10. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart.
VanDerWal, J., L. Falconi, S. Januchowski, L. Shoo and C. Storlie. 2014. SDMTools: Species Distribution Modelling Tools: Tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R package version 1.1-221. Last accessed online on Jan. 19, 2016, at: http://CRAN.R-
project.org/package=SDMTools.
Venables, W.N., and B.D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York.
Zhao, F., C.Q. Huang, and Z.L. Zhu. 2015. Use of Vegetation Change Tracker and Support Vector Machine to Map Disturbance Types in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystems in a 1984-2010 Landsat Time Series. Ieee
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. 12(8):1650-1654. Last accessed online on Feb. 10, 2016, at: http://www.usgs.gov.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) following the publication by the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).