Experiment and research on predicted model of forest fire spread based on ensemble Kalman filter

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Ensemble Kalman filter, Rothermel forest fire spread formula, fire spread prediction, fire spread contour error

Resumen

The spread of forest fire is an extremely complex and harmful natural phenomenon. The existing model fails to combine the influence factors of forest fire spread, and the error of prediction will increase with time. In this paper, the Ensemble Kalman Filter (ENKF) algorithm is applied to the field of forest fire spread so that it can better optimize the speed of forest fire. Firstly, the Rothermel formula of fire speed is simplified, and the speed value of simplified Rothermel is optimized by the speed value of actual measured about fire spread, so that the optimal speed value is obtained, then the optimal speed is input into Cellular Automata (CA) to simulate the spread of forest fire. Secondly, the experiment is carried out by changing the slope, bed thickness, moisture content, load and wind speed, then the measured speed of fire spread, the speed of simplified Rothermel and the optimized speed by ENKF are compared in the process of fire spread. Finally, the experimental results show that the error of fire speed optimized by ENKF is smaller, the contour simulated by CA with the ENKF is closer to the contour of real fire spread, and the highest similarity index is 0.854. The model proposed in this paper has the ability to predict the spread of forest fire indoors.

Referencias

Dhall A. , Dhasade A. , Nalwade A. , et al. 2020. A survey on systematic approaches in managing forest fires. Applied Geography, 121:102266. DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog. 2020.102266.

Denham M. , Wendt K. , Bianchini G. , et al. 2012. Dynamic Data-Driven Genetic Algorithm for forest fire spread prediction. Journal of Computational Science, 3(5):398-404. DOI:10.1016/j.jocs.2012.06.002 .

Finney M. A. , Grenfell I. C. , Mchugh, C. W. , et al. 2011. A method for ensemble wildland fire simulation. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING AND ASSESSMENT, 16(2): 153-167. DOI:10.1007/s10666-010-9241-3.

Finney M. , Cohen J. , McAllister S. , Jolly W. 2013. On the need for a theory of wildland fire spread. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22(1): 25–36. Doi:10.1071/WF11117.

Hua J. , Zhang S. , Gao H. , et al. 2020. Optimizing the Rothermel model for easily Predicting spread rate of forest fire. Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences, 12(2): 62-71. DIO:

Hui S , Rui X , Li Y. , et al. 2016. An Improved Forest Fire Spread Simulation Algorithm Coupled with Cellular Automata. Geomatics and information Scicnce of Wuhan University, 41(10):1326-1332. DOI:10. 13203/j. whugis20140811.

Jin X. , Kumar L. , Li Z. , et al. 2018. A review of data assimilation of remote sensing and crop models. European Journal of Agronomy, 92:141-152. DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.002.

Metref, S. , Hannart, A. , Ruiz, J, et al. 2019. Estimating model evidence using ensemble-based data assimilation with localization - the model selection problem. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 145:1571-1588. DOI:10.1002/qj.3513.

Ntinas V., Moutafis B. , Trunfio G. , et al. 2016. Parallel Fuzzy Cellular Automata for Data-Driven Simulation of Wildfire Spreading. Journal of Computationalence, 21(7):469-485. DOI:10.1016/j.jocs.2016.08.003.

Pagnini, G. , Mentrelli, A. . 2014. Modelling wildland fire propagation by tracking random fronts. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(6): 6521-6557. DOI:10.5194/nhess-14-2249-2014.

Pilo G. , Oke P. , Richard C. , et al. 2018. Impact of data assimilation on vertical velocities in an eddy resolving ocean model. Ocean Modelling, 131:71-85. DOI:10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.09.003.

Rossi L. , Molinier T. , Akhloufi M. . 2019. Advanced stereovision system for fire spreading study . Fire Safety Journal. 60(8):64-72. DOI:10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.10.015.

Reichle, R. H., Walker, J. P ., Koster, R. D., et al. 2002. Extended versus Ensemble Kalman filtering for land dataassimilation.Hydrometeorol, 3:728–740. DIO: 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0728:EVEKFF>2.0.CO;2.

Rochoux M., Emery C. , Ricci S. , et al. 2014. Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread - Part II: Ensemble Kalman Filter for the state estimation of a front-tracking simulator of wildfire spread. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2(5):3769-3820. DOI:10.5194/nhess-15-1721-2015.

Sun T. , Zhang L. , Chen W. , et al. 2013. Mountains forest fire spread simulator based on geo-cellular automaton combined with wang zhengfei velocity model. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(4): 1971-1987. DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2231956.

Tartés Cencerrado A. , A Cortés, Margalef . 2014. Towards a dynamic data driven wildfire behavior prediction system at european level. Procedia Computer Science, 29: 1216-1226. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.109.

Valero M. , Rios O. , Mata C. , et al. 2017. An integrated approach for tactical monitoring and data-driven spread forecasting of wildfires. Fire Safety Journal, 91(7):835-844. DOI:10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.085.

Zhou, T. , Ding, L. , Ji J., et al. 2020. Combined estimation of fire perimeters and fuel adjustment factors in farsite for forecasting wildland fire propagation. Fire Safety Journal, 116(9):103167. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103167.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-11-01

Número

Sección

Mathematical Modeling

Cómo citar

Experiment and research on predicted model of forest fire spread based on ensemble Kalman filter. (2021). Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS), 13(2), 5-13(9). https://tmp.mcfns.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/13.6

Artículos similares

1-10 de 84

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a